Table of Contents
SERIES 7 | SERIES 24 | FINANCIAL REGULATION COURSES
FINRA Rule 11650 is the final rule of the FINRA Rule 11600 subsection — a single-sentence cost-allocation rule resolving the transfer fee question this dictionary's FINRA Rule 11600 entry anticipated, and connecting directly to the interchange charge language this dictionary encountered in FINRA Rule 11362(c).
The rule's complete operative text reads: the party at whose instance a transfer of securities is made shall pay all service charges of the transfer agent. FINRA Rule 11650 was amended by SR-FINRA-2010-030 effective December 15, 2010, as part of the Uniform Practice Code's transfer into the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook — no prior amendment date is listed. One selected notice is associated — Regulatory Notice 10-49.
FINRA Rule 11650 sits within the 11600 Delivery of Bonds and Other Evidences of Indebtedness subsection of the 11000 Uniform Practice Code as its fifth and final rule, immediately following FINRA Rule 11640's claims for dividends, rights, interest, etc. framework and immediately preceding FINRA Rule 11700, the series-level marker for the Reclamations and Rejections subsection.
FINRA Rule 11650's allocation principle — the party at whose instance a transfer of securities is made shall pay all service charges of the transfer agent — assigns responsibility for transfer agent service charges based on causation rather than on the fixed buyer/seller roles this dictionary has observed govern most other cost-allocation provisions throughout the Uniform Practice Code. Where FINRA Rule 11340(b) places stamp tax responsibility on the seller as a categorical matter, and FINRA Rule 11410(d) places shipment expenses on the seller as a categorical matter, FINRA Rule 11650 instead asks a factual question — at whose instance was this particular transfer made? — and assigns the resulting service charges to whichever party that inquiry identifies.
This causation-based approach makes sense given the variety of circumstances under which a registered security's transfer might be instigated. A transfer might be instigated by the seller, fulfilling a delivery obligation under FINRA Rule 11550's general assignment framework. It might be instigated by the buyer, seeking re-registration into the buyer's own name after receiving a certificate. It might be instigated in connection with one of the FINRA Rule 11570 cluster's specialized scenarios — a change of trustee under FINRA Rule 11574's Sample Limited Partnership Change of Trustee Form, for instance, where neither an ordinary buyer nor seller in the FINRA Rule 11550 sense is necessarily the relevant party, but rather the assignor or assignee in the trustee-change transaction. FINRA Rule 11650's at whose instance formulation accommodates this variety by tying the service-charge obligation to whichever party's request or action actually caused the transfer agent to perform the transfer, rather than assuming any single party (buyer or seller) is always the responsible one.
This dictionary's earlier entry on FINRA Rule 11362(c) — the either-form default for bonds issuable in both coupon and registered form — noted that contracts settled by delivery in either form remain valid notwithstanding that there may be a charge for interchanging one form with the other, and identified this notwithstanding clause as a direct foreshadowing of FINRA Rule 11650's transfer fees framework.
FINRA Rule 11650 now confirms and resolves that foreshadowed question. Where a bond issuable in either coupon or registered form is delivered in a form requiring interchange — for example, where the delivering party holds the bond in coupon form but the contract, or the receiving party's preference, calls for registered form — the resulting interchange charge is a service charge of the transfer agent (the entity that would process such an interchange), and FINRA Rule 11650 assigns responsibility for that charge to the party at whose instance the interchange-requiring transfer was made. If the delivering party chose to deliver in a form requiring interchange (rather than delivering in the form the bond was already held in), that delivering party's choice would be the instance prompting the interchange, and FINRA Rule 11650 would place the resulting service charge on that party.
FINRA Rule 11650's general transfer agent service charge framework also operates as the cost-allocation backdrop for the various transfer scenarios this dictionary examined throughout the FINRA Rule 11570 cluster and FINRA Rules 11580 and 11581. A transfer effected under FINRA Rule 11571(a)'s "Proper papers for transfer filed by assignor" framework, a change of trustee effected under FINRA Rule 11574's Sample Limited Partnership Change of Trustee Form, or a limited partnership transfer effected under FINRA Rule 11580's standard transfer forms — each of these scenarios involves a transfer agent (or, in the limited partnership context, the General Partner performing an analogous re-registration function, as FINRA Rule 11574's Supplementary Material .01 confirmed) performing a service in connection with the transfer. FINRA Rule 11650 establishes that whatever service charges the transfer agent imposes for performing that service fall on the party at whose instance the transfer was made — a general principle that applies across this entire range of transfer scenarios without FINRA Rule 11650 itself needing to enumerate each one specifically, consistent with the kind of general-principle-applicable-across-specific-scenarios drafting this dictionary has observed elsewhere in the Uniform Practice Code.
FINRA Rule 11650's position as the final rule of the FINRA Rule 11600 subsection — following FINRA Rule 11610's comprehensive bond good delivery framework, FINRA Rule 11620's interest computation mechanics, FINRA Rule 11630's due-bill framework, and FINRA Rule 11640's claims framework — provides a brief but fitting conclusion to the subsection's progression. Where FINRA Rules 11620 through 11640 addressed the substantive mechanics of interest, distributions, and claims arising around record dates, FINRA Rule 11650 addresses the simpler, more general question of who pays for the transfer agent's service in processing a registered security's transfer — a question that, unlike the record-date-timing questions FINRA Rules 11620 through 11640 address, does not depend on ex-dividend dates, due-bills, or claims procedures, but simply on which party's instance caused the transfer to occur.
FINRA Rule 11650 connects to FINRA Rule 11340(b) and FINRA Rule 11410(d) as points of structural contrast — both of those rules establish categorical (seller-borne) cost allocations, while FINRA Rule 11650 establishes a causation-based (at whose instance) allocation instead. It connects directly to FINRA Rule 11362(c) — whose interchange charge notwithstanding clause this entry has confirmed is resolved by FINRA Rule 11650's general transfer agent service charge framework. It connects to FINRA Rule 11550 and the FINRA Rule 11570 cluster (FINRA Rules 11571 through 11574) — whose various transfer-processing scenarios FINRA Rule 11650's general principle applies to as the cost-allocation backdrop. It connects to FINRA Rule 11580 — whose limited partnership transfer framework, processed through the General Partner per FINRA Rule 11574's Supplementary Material .01, falls within FINRA Rule 11650's transfer agent service charge framework by analogy. And it connects to FINRA Rule 11600 as its parent series marker, the final rule completing that five-rule subsection.
FINRA Rule 11650 is tested on the Series 7 and Series 24 examinations as the transfer agent service charge allocation rule — the final rule of the FINRA Rule 11600 subsection, resolving the interchange charge question FINRA Rule 11362(c) foreshadowed.
The key points to retain are these: FINRA Rule 11650 provides that the party at whose instance a transfer of securities is made shall pay all service charges of the transfer agent — a causation-based allocation, distinguishing it from the categorical seller-borne allocations of FINRA Rule 11340(b) and FINRA Rule 11410(d); this framework resolves the interchange charge question FINRA Rule 11362(c)'s notwithstanding clause raised for bonds issuable in both coupon and registered form, placing such charges on whichever party's instance prompted the form-changing transfer; FINRA Rule 11650's general principle applies as the cost-allocation backdrop for the various transfer scenarios addressed throughout FINRA Rule 11550 and the FINRA Rule 11570 cluster, as well as FINRA Rule 11580's limited partnership transfer framework processed through the General Partner; and the rule was amended December 15, 2010 through SR-FINRA-2010-030 — no prior amendment date listed — with one selected notice, 10-49.
