Table of Contents
SERIES 7 | SERIES 24 | FINANCIAL REGULATION COURSES
FINRA Rule 11540 addresses two distinct categories of governmental restriction that bear on good delivery — the general case of any governmental documentation requirement attaching to a security, and the specific case of foreign securities certificates subject to blacklisting or similar stoppage mechanisms, with the latter carrying a distinctive unlimited reclamation period.
The rule operates through two lettered paragraphs.
Paragraph (a), Documents Required, establishes that where the laws, regulations, rulings, instructions, or orders of any government, government instrumentality or agency, or official thereof having jurisdiction require a license, clearance certificate, affidavit of ownership, or any similar document in connection with the acquisition, disposition, transfer, redemption, or other dealing with respect to any security, that security shall not be good delivery unless accompanied by the required document or documents.
Paragraph (b), Certificate Subject to Stoppage, establishes that if a specific certificate tendered in settlement of a contract in foreign securities is on a black list, blocked list, or subject to similar stoppage from which an innocent holder in due course cannot have it removed by simple request, that certificate is not good delivery, and reclamation may be made without limit of time. FINRA Rule 11540 was amended by SR-FINRA-2010-030 effective December 15, 2010 — no prior amendment date is listed. One selected notice is associated — Regulatory Notice 10-49.
FINRA Rule 11540 sits within the 11500 Delivery of Securities with Restrictions subsection of the 11000 Uniform Practice Code, immediately following FINRA Rule 11530's framework for called or worthless securities and immediately preceding FINRA Rule 11550's assignments and powers of substitution framework for registered securities.
FINRA Rule 11540(a) establishes a broadly framed conditional requirement — when governmental authority of any kind, at any level, requires some form of documentation in connection with a security, that security is not good delivery unless the required documentation accompanies it.
The breadth of this provision's framing deserves attention. The triggering authority is described expansively — the laws, regulations, rulings, instructions or orders of any government, government instrumentality or agency, or official thereof having jurisdiction.
This formulation does not limit itself to United States federal law, nor to any particular level or branch of government — any government with jurisdiction over the relevant security, transaction, or party, whether that government is foreign or domestic, national or sub-national, and whether the requirement takes the form of a statute, a regulation, a ruling, an instruction, or an order, falls within paragraph (a)'s scope.
The triggering activities are similarly broad — the acquisition, disposition, transfer or redemption of, or other dealing in or with respect to, any security. This formulation encompasses essentially the full range of activities a holder or transacting party might engage in with respect to a security — acquiring it, disposing of it, transferring it, redeeming it, or any other dealing with respect to it — ensuring that paragraph (a) is not narrowly confined to, for example, only the transfer step of a transaction, but extends to whatever point in a security's lifecycle a governmental documentation requirement might attach.
The required documents themselves are described both specifically and with a catch-all — a license, clearance certificate, affidavit of ownership or any similar document. The three named examples — license, clearance certificate, affidavit of ownership — represent recognizable categories of governmental documentation that might attach to securities transactions, while the any similar document catch-all ensures that paragraph (a) is not limited to only these three named categories, but extends to whatever form of governmental documentation a given jurisdiction's law might require, provided it is similar in character to a license, clearance certificate, or affidavit of ownership.
The consequence of this framework is straightforward and absolute in its formulation — such security shall not be a good delivery unless accompanied by the document or documents so required. Where a governmental documentation requirement of the kind paragraph (a) describes exists and applies to a given security, delivery of that security without the required document or documents does not constitute good delivery — the documentation requirement becomes, in effect, part of what must be delivered alongside the security itself for the delivery to be good.
FINRA Rule 11540(a)'s function can be understood as extending the good delivery concept — examined throughout this dictionary's coverage of FINRA Rules 11510, 11520, and 11530 — to encompass not merely the physical or registration condition of the security certificate itself, but also whatever external governmental documentation requirements may attach to dealings in that security.
FINRA Rule 11510 addressed whether a temporary certificate, as opposed to a permanent certificate, constitutes good delivery. FINRA Rule 11520 addressed whether a mutilated certificate, absent appropriate authentication or endorsement, constitutes good delivery. FINRA Rule 11530 addressed whether a called or worthless security, absent the specific accommodations that rule establishes, constitutes good delivery. FINRA Rule 11540(a) addresses a different dimension entirely — not the condition or status of the certificate itself, but the broader legal-regulatory environment within which the security exists, and specifically whether that legal-regulatory environment imposes documentation requirements that must travel with the security for delivery to be good.
This extension makes considerable practical sense. A security that is, in terms of its own condition and status, entirely unremarkable — a permanent, undamaged, uncalled certificate properly registered — might nonetheless be subject to governmental documentation requirements arising from the security's specific characteristics (its issuer's jurisdiction, the nature of the security, the parties involved in a given transaction, or any number of other factors that might trigger a given government's regulatory interest). FINRA Rule 11540(a) ensures that the good delivery framework accounts for this dimension as well — a security cannot be good delivery, regardless of its own physical or registration condition, if it is not accompanied by whatever governmental documentation a relevant government with jurisdiction requires.
FINRA Rule 11540(b) addresses a more specific and more severe scenario than paragraph (a)'s general documentation framework — certificates of foreign securities that are subject to a black list, blocked list, or similar stoppage mechanism from which an innocent holder in due course cannot obtain removal by simple request.
The black list and blocked list terminology invokes governmental sanctions and asset-control regimes — mechanisms through which a government identifies specific certificates, securities, or holders as subject to restriction, often in connection with foreign policy, sanctions enforcement, or similar governmental objectives. A certificate that has been placed on such a list, or subjected to a similar stoppage mechanism, may be unable to be transferred, redeemed, or otherwise dealt with in the ordinary course, regardless of the good faith or innocence of whoever currently holds it.
The from which an innocent holder in due course cannot have it removed by simple request qualifier is the critical threshold for paragraph (b)'s application. This qualifier distinguishes between two categories of listed or stopped certificates: those where an innocent holder in due course — a holder who acquired the certificate in good faith, for value, without notice of any defect — can obtain removal from the list or stoppage simply by requesting it, presumably by demonstrating their innocent-holder status to the relevant authority; and those where even an innocent holder in due course cannot obtain such removal through simple request, meaning the stoppage persists regardless of the current holder's good faith or status.
Paragraph (b) applies specifically to this second category — certificates where the stoppage cannot be resolved through simple request even by an innocent holder in due course. For such certificates, paragraph (b) establishes two consequences: first, such certificate is not a good delivery — consistent with the broader good delivery framework this dictionary has traced throughout the FINRA Rule 11500 subsection, a certificate subject to this kind of persistent stoppage simply does not satisfy the delivery standard. Second, and more distinctively, reclamation may be made without limit of time.
The without limit of time provision in FINRA Rule 11540(b) stands in sharp contrast to the time-bounded claims and reclamation provisions this dictionary has encountered elsewhere in the Uniform Practice Code — most notably FINRA Rule 11410(f)'s ten-day deadline for claims arising from draft shipments with irregularities, but more broadly the general emphasis on prompt resolution of settlement-related disputes that this dictionary has observed as a recurring theme throughout the Code's provisions.
FINRA Rule 11540(b)'s departure from this general promptness emphasis, for the specific category of certificates it addresses, reflects the distinctive character of the underlying problem. A certificate subject to a black list, blocked list, or similar stoppage from which even an innocent holder in due course cannot obtain removal by simple request represents a defect that is not merely operational or administrative in character — it is a defect rooted in governmental action, of the kind paragraph (a) more generally addresses, but elevated in paragraph (b) to a defect so persistent that ordinary remedial mechanisms (simple request for removal) do not resolve it.
Given this persistent, governmentally-rooted character, a time-limited reclamation period would risk leaving a receiving party permanently saddled with a certificate that can never be good delivery — if the reclamation period expired before the stoppage was resolved (which, given that even innocent holders cannot resolve it by simple request, might take an indeterminate and potentially very long time), the receiving party would have no recourse against the delivering party, despite having received a certificate that does not, and perhaps for a very long time will not, constitute good delivery. FINRA Rule 11540(b)'s without limit of time provision forecloses this outcome — the receiving party's right to reclaim such a certificate does not expire merely because time has passed, reflecting that the underlying defect itself may persist indefinitely until whatever governmental action created the stoppage is itself resolved or reversed.
FINRA Rule 11540's two paragraphs can be understood as addressing related but distinct points along a spectrum of governmental restriction. Paragraph (a) addresses the general case — governmental documentation requirements that, while they must be satisfied for good delivery, are presumably capable of being satisfied through the ordinary process of obtaining and providing the required documentation. A security subject to a license or clearance certificate requirement under paragraph (a) is not necessarily permanently or indefinitely incapable of good delivery — once the required documentation is obtained and provided, the security (accompanied by that documentation) becomes good delivery.
Paragraph (b) addresses a more extreme point on this spectrum — foreign securities certificates subject to a stoppage so persistent that even an innocent holder in due course cannot resolve it through simple request. This is not merely a documentation requirement that can be satisfied through an ordinary process; it is a stoppage that resists ordinary resolution mechanisms entirely, at least for the time being. The without limit of time reclamation period paragraph (b) provides reflects this more extreme character — a remedy calibrated to a defect that may not be resolvable on any predictable timeline, as distinguished from paragraph (a)'s documentation requirements, which presumably can be satisfied through the ordinary process of obtaining the required license, clearance certificate, or affidavit.
FINRA Rule 11540 connects to FINRA Rule 11110's good delivery framing as the third consecutive rule within the FINRA Rule 11500 subsection — following FINRA Rules 11510, 11520, and 11530 — to extend the good delivery concept to a further dimension, here the governmental-regulatory dimension rather than the certificate-condition or security-status dimensions those preceding rules addressed. It connects to FINRA Rule 11310(e)'s exclusion of transactions settled outside the United States, and more broadly to the cross-border accommodations this dictionary has observed throughout the Uniform Practice Code's treatment of foreign securities — paragraph (b)'s specific application to foreign securities situates it within this broader pattern of cross-border-specific provisions. It connects to FINRA Rule 11410(f)'s ten-day claims deadline as a point of contrast — where FINRA Rule 11410(f) establishes a short, defined claims period (with its own carve-out for the Reclamations framework), FINRA Rule 11540(b) establishes the opposite extreme, an unlimited reclamation period, for the specific category of persistently-stopped foreign securities certificates it addresses. It connects to FINRA Rules 11510, 11520, and 11530 as the immediately preceding rules within the FINRA Rule 11500 subsection, together forming a sequence of good-delivery-disqualifying conditions — temporary status, mutilation, called or worthless status, and now governmental documentation or stoppage. And it connects to FINRA Rules 11700 through 11740 — the Reclamations framework this dictionary anticipates examining after completing the FINRA Rule 11500 subsection, within which FINRA Rule 11540(b)'s without limit of time reclamation right for stopped foreign securities certificates would presumably operate as a specific, time-unlimited variant of the reclamation mechanisms that framework more generally establishes.
FINRA Rule 11540 is tested on the Series 7 and Series 24 examinations as the framework addressing governmental documentation requirements and foreign securities certificate stoppages — extending the good delivery concept to the governmental-regulatory dimension, with a distinctive unlimited reclamation period for the most persistent category of foreign securities stoppage.
The key points to retain are these: FINRA Rule 11540(a) provides that where any government, government instrumentality or agency, or official thereof having jurisdiction requires a license, clearance certificate, affidavit of ownership, or similar document in connection with the acquisition, disposition, transfer, redemption, or other dealing with respect to a security, that security is not good delivery unless accompanied by the required document or documents — a broadly framed provision covering any level of government, domestic or foreign, and any form of dealing with the security; FINRA Rule 11540(b) provides that for foreign securities specifically, a certificate tendered in settlement that is on a black list, blocked list, or subject to similar stoppage from which an innocent holder in due course cannot obtain removal by simple request is not good delivery, and reclamation for such a certificate may be made without limit of time — a stark departure from the prompt-resolution emphasis found elsewhere in the Uniform Practice Code, including FINRA Rule 11410(f)'s ten-day claims deadline, reflecting the persistent and governmentally-rooted character of the underlying defect; FINRA Rule 11540 extends the good delivery framework examined throughout FINRA Rules 11510, 11520, and 11530 to the governmental-regulatory dimension, addressing not the certificate's physical condition or security-status but the broader legal environment governing dealings in the security; and the rule was amended December 15, 2010 through SR-FINRA-2010-030 — no prior amendment date listed — with one selected notice, 10-49.
