Finance
The Post-Brexit Financial Landscape
Last updated: Jun 7, 2021 • 4min read
Globally Recognized Certifications
.png)
Finance
Last updated: Jun 7, 2021 • 4min read
The United Kingdom's departure from the European Union, commonly known as Brexit, has had profound implications for various sectors of the UK economy. One of the most significant areas affected is the financial services industry, which had previously benefited from the EU’s single market and regulatory framework. Since Brexit, the UK has no longer been part of the EU single market, and its financial services are now regulated by separate UK-specific laws.
The change has prompted a shift in how financial firms operate both within the UK and across the EU. To ensure that financial services continue to function smoothly in this new environment, the UK has made a series of regulatory adaptations to accommodate its new status outside the EU. This article delves into the key changes in the UK’s financial regulatory landscape post-Brexit, and what firms need to know to stay compliant, competitive, and prepared for the future.
1. Loss of EU Passporting Rights
One of the most significant consequences of Brexit for financial firms operating in the UK is the loss of passporting rights. Prior to Brexit, financial institutions in the UK enjoyed the benefit of passporting—a system that allowed them to offer services across the EU without needing additional licenses or authorisations. This system was a key part of the EU’s single market, providing financial firms in the UK with access to the 27 EU member states.
After Brexit, UK-based financial firms lost this automatic right to operate within the EU. Firms now must comply with the regulatory requirements of each individual EU member state in order to continue providing services across the EU. This means that UK-based firms may face the need to:
Obtain separate authorisation in the EU: Firms must apply for licences with national regulators in EU countries to continue providing services to EU clients.
Establish an EU presence: Many firms have responded by establishing branches or subsidiaries in EU countries (e.g., Ireland, Luxembourg, or the Netherlands) to maintain access to EU markets.
The UK and the EU have implemented a system known as equivalence to allow for some cross-border financial activities. Under equivalence, the EU can recognise the UK’s regulatory standards as being sufficiently aligned with its own. This system permits firms in the UK to access certain EU markets and services, although it is not as broad or guaranteed as passporting.
Challenges for Firms: The equivalence regime is unilateral, meaning the EU is under no obligation to recognise UK regulations. Therefore, UK firms face uncertainty about whether and when equivalence will apply.
Key Areas for Preparation: Financial firms should carefully monitor the status of equivalence decisions for specific sectors (e.g., insurance, asset management) and adjust their operations accordingly to ensure continued access to the EU market.
2. Changes to Regulatory Framework: Divergence from EU Rules
With Brexit, the UK has gained more control over its regulatory framework, and the government and regulators are no longer bound by EU regulations. This has led to the potential for regulatory divergence between the UK and the EU, meaning the UK can implement its own rules that may differ from EU standards.
Initially, the UK sought to maintain regulatory continuity by retaining EU laws within the UK legal framework. These laws were converted into UK domestic law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. However, over time, the UK government has the option to amend or replace these rules to better align with UK priorities.
Example: One notable area of divergence has been in MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive), which governs financial markets in the EU. While the UK initially retained many of its provisions post-Brexit, there has been discussion about reviewing and potentially relaxing some of the requirements, particularly regarding best execution and transparency.
The UK’s regulators, such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), now have more autonomy to adapt regulations to suit the UK’s specific needs. For instance, the UK government has indicated a desire to create a more flexible and competitive regulatory environment to support innovation, especially in sectors like FinTech and digital assets.
Challenges for Firms: Firms need to stay informed about ongoing changes to UK financial regulations, as the UK could gradually diverge from EU rules in areas like prudential regulation, conduct standards, and financial market transparency.
Key Areas for Preparation: Firms should keep an eye on regulatory consultations and updates from UK authorities regarding potential regulatory changes and consider adjusting their compliance frameworks accordingly.
3. Changes to Cross-Border Operations and Contracts
The end of the EU’s single market for UK-based financial services has also impacted how UK firms manage their cross-border operations and contracts. The cross-border distribution of financial products and services has become more complex, with new requirements for firms offering services in both the UK and EU.
Financial firms operating in the UK and the EU must now account for differences in jurisdiction and legal processes. For example, firms may need to include alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clauses in contracts, and ensure that they meet the regulatory and legal requirements in each jurisdiction.
Challenges for Firms: Firms need to review their existing contracts with EU clients and update them to reflect post-Brexit legal requirements, particularly with respect to dispute resolution, jurisdictional clauses, and service agreements.
Key Areas for Preparation: Firms should work with legal teams to assess existing contracts and identify potential issues arising from post-Brexit regulations. Adjustments may need to be made to the wording of contracts to ensure they comply with both UK and EU law.
The UK's exit from the EU means that firms engaged in the trade of financial products and investment services will face new customs procedures, documentation requirements, and possibly tariffs or duties, depending on the product type.
Challenges for Firms: Firms involved in cross-border trading or investment services will need to navigate new customs and taxation regimes that are specific to the UK-EU relationship.
Key Areas for Preparation: Firms must engage with trade experts and advisors to understand how Brexit affects their cross-border operations and ensure that they have the necessary documentation in place to avoid disruptions.
4. Impact on Regulatory Oversight and Enforcement
Post-Brexit, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) continue to supervise the UK financial services industry, but their roles have become more distinct from their EU counterparts. UK regulators now have complete autonomy to enforce domestic rules and regulations without any obligation to align with EU regulations.
The FCA and PRA are now focused on creating a tailored regulatory environment for UK firms, with an emphasis on innovation, consumer protection, and maintaining financial stability. This includes fostering the growth of sectors like Fintech, insurtech, and green finance.
Challenges for Firms: UK firms will need to adapt to the evolving priorities of the FCA and PRA, which may include stricter enforcement in some areas (e.g., consumer protection) and greater flexibility in others (e.g., fintech regulation).
Key Areas for Preparation: Firms should stay closely connected to the FCA and PRA’s consultations and reviews. Engaging in the regulatory discussion can help firms anticipate changes and align their business strategies accordingly.
5. Post-Brexit Transition for Financial Services Providers
While UK financial services have faced challenges in the wake of Brexit, the industry is also adapting and seeking opportunities to diversify and innovate. However, firms must continue to ensure that their operational models, compliance functions, and cross-border activities align with both UK domestic regulations and the evolving international landscape.
Brexit has limited the free movement of workers between the UK and EU, which could impact firms that rely on EU talent. For example, financial institutions in the UK may face difficulties hiring workers from the EU without securing appropriate work visas or permits.
Challenges for Firms: Financial firms will need to adjust their recruitment strategies to comply with new immigration rules, ensuring they have the right talent to meet regulatory requirements and business objectives.
Key Areas for Preparation: Firms should establish clear strategies for talent acquisition, ensuring compliance with immigration laws and visa requirements. They may also consider upskilling local talent to reduce reliance on overseas workers.
Brexit has led to a series of fundamental changes in the UK’s financial regulatory landscape. The loss of passporting rights, the move towards regulatory divergence, and the introduction of new cross-border barriers are just a few of the challenges that UK firms must face. However, these challenges also present opportunities for the UK to implement more tailored, flexible, and competitive regulations.
To thrive in the post-Brexit environment, financial firms must remain proactive in understanding evolving regulations, maintaining compliance with both UK and EU requirements, and adapting to new operational and market dynamics. By staying informed and agile, firms can navigate the complexities of the post-Brexit regulatory landscape and continue to thrive in a rapidly changing global financial ecosystem.
Be the first to know about new class launches and announcements.
Financial writer and analyst Ron Finely shows you how to navigate financial markets, manage investments, and build wealth through strategic decision-making.
See why leading organizations rely on FRC for learning & development.
