.png)
Brexit, the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, has had a profound impact on many sectors of the economy, and the financial services industry is no exception. As one of the world’s leading financial hubs, the UK’s financial regulatory framework had to evolve significantly following Brexit. The country’s exit from the EU has allowed the UK to reshape its regulatory landscape, creating new opportunities for flexibility and innovation while also presenting challenges in terms of market access, cross-border regulation, and the harmonisation of laws.
This article will explore how UK financial regulations have evolved post-Brexit, focusing on the key changes that have occurred in the regulatory environment, the transition from EU laws to UK-specific rules, and the broader implications for financial services in the UK. We will examine the key areas affected by Brexit, including regulatory divergence, market access, financial innovation, and the role of financial regulators in the new post-Brexit era.
One of the most significant impacts of Brexit on the UK’s financial services industry was the loss of the EU’s passporting rights. Prior to Brexit, UK-based financial firms enjoyed the ability to operate across the EU with a single set of regulatory standards, a concept known as passporting. This allowed UK firms to provide services across the EU without needing to establish separate entities in individual EU member states.
When the UK left the EU, passporting rights ceased to apply. This meant that UK financial firms could no longer provide services to customers across the EU based on their UK authorisation alone. As a result, many UK firms had to re-evaluate their business models, with some choosing to establish subsidiaries or branch offices within the EU to retain access to European markets.
For instance, large investment banks, insurers, and asset managers have moved parts of their operations to financial hubs such as Dublin, Frankfurt, and Luxembourg in order to continue serving EU customers. This move was necessary to avoid losing access to the EU’s single market and to comply with the EU’s regulatory requirements.
While losing passporting rights posed a challenge, it also created opportunities for the UK to define its own regulatory framework. This has allowed the UK to establish more tailored regulations that could better suit its domestic financial services sector, and potentially make it more competitive compared to the EU. The UK’s Financial Services Act 2021 and the creation of new regimes, such as the London-Luxembourg Connect initiative for asset managers, have been part of efforts to capitalise on these opportunities.
In order to ensure that financial markets continue to function smoothly post-Brexit, the UK implemented a process of onshoring EU laws. Onshoring refers to the process of converting EU laws and regulations into UK law so that they continue to apply after Brexit. This was necessary to prevent regulatory gaps and ensure continuity in financial services.
Many EU regulations that governed financial services, such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), Solvency II, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), were incorporated into UK law through the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. The goal was to create a seamless transition, ensuring that UK firms could continue to operate as they did before Brexit, without the need for extensive changes to their internal systems.
However, onshoring did not mean that UK regulations would remain identical to their EU counterparts. The UK had the freedom to amend, remove, or replace certain regulations where it saw fit, marking the beginning of regulatory divergence between the UK and the EU.
The UK’s regulatory bodies, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Bank of England (BoE), played a key role in implementing the onshoring process. These bodies worked to ensure that EU rules were transposed effectively and that the UK’s regulatory framework remained robust and effective after Brexit.
In certain areas, the UK’s regulators have also taken steps to introduce reforms to enhance market efficiency, promote competition, and allow for greater flexibility. For example, the FCA introduced a more flexible framework for listing rules in 2021, allowing companies to list with dual-class share structures, which is a departure from the EU’s stricter rules.
One of the most significant outcomes of Brexit is the possibility for regulatory divergence. Before Brexit, the UK had to adhere to EU regulations, many of which were designed to harmonise financial services across the EU. With the end of the transition period, the UK is no longer bound by EU laws and has the flexibility to create a regulatory framework that best suits its needs.
The UK government has expressed its intention to create a regulatory environment that encourages innovation and competitiveness, particularly in areas such as fintech, insurtech, and green finance. For instance, the UK has already introduced new regulations in areas like cryptocurrency and crowdfunding, allowing greater flexibility compared to the EU.
In the realm of banking regulation, the UK has introduced reforms aimed at promoting open banking, which allows consumers to have greater control over their financial data and how it is used by third parties. Similarly, the UK is exploring options to introduce a more flexible approach to capital markets regulation, which could attract international investors and firms.
However, regulatory divergence also presents challenges. The UK must ensure that its regulations remain aligned enough with EU standards to facilitate cross-border trade in financial services. In certain areas, significant divergence could lead to barriers to entry for UK firms in the EU market, especially in terms of market access.
A key example of this challenge is the Equivalence framework. The UK has sought to establish an equivalence arrangement with the EU, which would allow UK firms to continue operating in the EU on a similar basis as they did when the UK was a member state. However, the EU has been reluctant to grant full equivalence in some areas, such as financial services, leading to uncertainty over the future of cross-border trade in these sectors.
While Brexit has led to regulatory changes and some loss of market access to the EU, the UK’s position as a global financial centre remains strong. The UK remains a leader in areas such as banking, investment, asset management, and fintech. In fact, some argue that the UK’s ability to craft its own financial regulations post-Brexit will allow it to continue innovating and adapting to global financial trends.
The UK government has actively sought to strengthen its relationships with non-EU countries, establishing trade deals and agreements with the United States, Japan, Australia, and other major economies. These deals are aimed at enhancing the UK’s global financial position and improving access to international markets.
Furthermore, the UK is positioning itself as a leader in green finance and sustainable investing, aiming to build on the success of the London Stock Exchange and attract investment in low-carbon projects.
The Financial Services Act 2021, which was passed after Brexit, highlights the UK’s commitment to maintaining its position as a global financial leader. The Act introduced measures aimed at improving financial market transparency, providing greater consumer protection, and promoting financial innovation. It also includes provisions to ensure that UK financial services can continue to grow and thrive in a post-Brexit world.
Brexit has undoubtedly had a significant impact on the UK’s financial regulatory framework, creating both opportunities and challenges. While the end of passporting rights and the loss of direct access to the EU market posed immediate difficulties for UK firms, the UK has seized the opportunity to reshape its regulatory environment to suit its own needs.
Through onshoring EU regulations and implementing reforms in areas such as capital markets, fintech, and green finance, the UK has aimed to create a more flexible, innovative, and competitive financial services sector. At the same time, the country has had to navigate the complexities of regulatory divergence and the challenges of establishing equivalence with the EU.
Ultimately, the future of the UK’s financial services industry will depend on how effectively it can balance regulatory independence with the need for global market access. As the country continues to adapt to its new post-Brexit reality, its ability to attract investment, foster innovation, and maintain market stability will be key to securing its position as a leading global financial centre.
Be the first to know about new class launches and announcements.
Financial writer and analyst Ron Finely shows you how to navigate financial markets, manage investments, and build wealth through strategic decision-making.
See why leading organizations rely on FRC for learning & development.
